Michelin Red Guide 2009 Paris: Restaurants & Hotels (Michelin Red Guide: Paris)

Comment: This is a much abridged and limited complilation of the Michelin Red Guide to Paris Hotels and Restaurants. This is purported to be the "select" best ideas. Having lived in Paris for 4 years--I disagree. It's very judgemental--and the judgements are flawed. I expected the full Paris section of the France Red Guide. Instead I got a limited and flawed subset. This guide is neither comprehensive nor useful. Save your money.

Comment: I have given a prior Paris Michelin a very enthusiastic review--no longer applicable. The current version is a seriously flawed attempt at a "greatest [somewhat popular] hits" version of a Paris Michelin red guide. We now supposedly have a selection of the "420 best restaurants" in Paris. Far from accurate. Many surprising fillers have made Michelin's cut from the full list. You have to read between the lines--a restaurant that is faintly praised as "not without charm" really means it is without charm. And many restaurants in Paris, along with the entire suburbs, are dropped entirely. The hotel list is significantly pared down from the full book. 60 hotels, that's it. Organized alphabetically, not by location, which diminishes the utility of the hotel list while it hides the tiny number represented. Perhaps the tour groups targeted for this book have already picked their hotels.

Michelin acknowledges it's a smaller list than the Paris section of the full France book, but then goes on to confuse by saying that "This publication presents a larger selection of hotels carefully selected by our inspectors." "This publication" is the big France book with the complete "selection"--not the Paris book you were looking to buy with its even more pared down sub-selection taken from the larger selection. This modern Paris Michelin does in fact have some useful information, e.g., weekend openings on its limited list, but it is so coyly presented for Michelin's own misguided marketing purposes, that most will be better served by an alternative guide.

Comment: The 2009 Michelin Guide published in English contains many fewer entries and recommendations than does its French counterpart. The restaurant reviews are accurate in my experience, but it would be preferable to have more, shorter entries. Those of the hotels are even sparser and mainly focus on higher-end options. Worse yet is the hotel reviewer's prose. The word "amazing," grossly overused as it now is, conveys nothing about the quality of an establishment. The French version does not require an advanced knowledge of the language to understand and it is far more thorough.

Comment: I'm sure the restaurants are wonderful, but the Michelin Paris Red Guide in English is exceedingly coy - restaurant reviews with exclamation marks are suspect.

The Red Guides in French are worth struggling with (if you're not fluent in French). This book treats non-French speaking readers like little children.

It also needs proofreading for typos and hyphenation.